xGov Registry v3.0.0

this seems too complex to achieve what? isn’t it enough to disregard absentees in democratic quorum to fix absenteeism issue? three types of no’s (sic). let me add a fourth no to this v3.0.0 - no to three types of no’s. now we have four no’s.

xGov Council Meeting #9 (January 7th, 2026)

very good session

xGov Council meeting #6 (Nov 26th 2025)

appreciate this

xGov Council Election 2025

Many updates since then! so happy Adri likes it

So glad that you could change it change it during a live vote session after all. Don’t understand the last statement, is it any different from other candidates?

Can I vote on xGov (mainnet) without my own node?

iiuc xgov voters are voting through their Reti pools. @krby.algo might shed light on how exactly. the vanilla governance right now to vote in council members excludes reti poolers

Patrick Bennet’s name is spelled as Paul in his bio on governance website. also the bio gives an impression as if he’s an outsourced fiverr and not a co-founder of txlab

one needs the minimum stake on Valar, but not on Reti

[742319592] test thread for mock proposal

anime baby anime baby

xGov Platform - Beta Testnet Launch

Hi, I signed up and would like access to propose! TY

Official announcement for Reti Pooling users about Governance Period 15

extremely disappointing. putting the limitation blame on Reti, all the while it is a foundation owned product is shooting one self in both legs. 400M staked Algos disapproved, the place where those with smaller bags can participate in a collective manner is kicked out of governance, with all their …

Streamlining xGov Council for a High-Quality Election

I think most of it has been said already

This is where I disagree. There was enough feedback with based arguments on why doxxing to the whole world was a bad idea. And here is where the decentralization theater of xgov is revealed. I’d rather foundation leaned into the centralized aspects of the whole process instead of waiving our conc…

couldn’t agree more on this point. 85% approval yes, but the topics to be voted on were biased, framed and loaded. In lack of better language. There is no shame in reversing course and truly take the feedback to heart. The, as Ghost put it, geriatric pace of xgov process is becoming anecdotical …

The xGov Council: Shaping the future of xGov

In this day and age, considering the global nature of this ecosystem, it is increasingly less difficult to obtain a false identity to sneak into the council than to obtain and keep good reputation as a pseudo-anonymous community member. Qualifications that look good on paper is worth nothing compar…

Have you calculated how big of a stake one must have to propose 500 blocks every 10K rounds? Sounds like quite a stake! Also, there is some terminology inconsistency going around. Many can propose a block, but only one validator can win one at a time. Do you mean the former or the latter?

Agree with Fisherman, council members can apply, but not review and vote on their own proposals. Doxxing a potential member for everyone or AF only? If the former, I don’t think it’s necessary. Since member nominations are basically a community trust vote, pseudo-anonymous individuals can have just…

xGov#199 - AWallet - Retroactive

do you think it gives you more credibility?

Are you not anonymous too?

[xGov][Community meeting][New Version][2024/04/04]

I will not comment the KYC, but rather ask what else will change in the submission process? Because I do have some concerns on current system. There seems to be a very low threshold on what is actually asked of an applicant to include in the proposal. Technical project des…

yes, you must forgive me, it’s still very confusing to me to navigate between broken up conversations between GitHub, here, Discord… I’m getting the hang of it soon!!

Retroactive funding is supposed to go to projects that have contributed to Algo community significantly and irrefutably. To teams with impeccable integrity and reputation. To products that are widely implemented and used. Awallet and its team does not meat these criteria, and hence should abstain…

GP7 Measures DRAFT - NFT Rewards Pilot

This adds lots of complexity and workload for the council. What of there was a way for a project creator to sign up for this program? A simple txn from creator wallet just to let everyone know the creator is alive and still follow the ecosystem. Of course the great rekey, and lost account issues du…

Great point on royalties based rewards. Second point is harder, how would one define a dead project?

Which marketplaces have legal entities in US, Canada and India? Thinking specifically about Rand, AxN - are they ok?