All - Activity - Gary2 - Algorand
Consensus rewards and fee to go back online
I understand the reason for wanting to charge a fee to go back online if a node goes down without being marked as offline first. It is meant to encourage responsible participation. I would like to add my thoughts as the size of this fee is being decided. I live in an area with pretty good electri…
GP8 Measures DRAFT DeFi Rewards Allocation Q4
Node runners can add both their wallet and their escrow account. So when they redeem galgo the Algo will be in their wallet and the same amount of Algo will be participating.
GP7 Measures DRAFT - Liquidity Provision
Liquidity should be provided on in the form of Liquidity pools. Algo should not be used in Lending protocols because this liquidity just ends up locked in governance through leveraged commit. Cheaper Algo is not what we need right now.
PPoS xGov Proposal
Choosing a single wallet for governance would hurt competition and discourage the development of new wallets. This would lead to centralization based with only 1 viable wallet. There also should be some criteria for creating a proposal as it could lead to too many proposals for people to navigate…
Feedback request on proposed Q4 2022 governance measures
How will the lowering of total rewards for the next two periods impact future rewards? Currently the rewards pool is supposed to be fully distributed by 2030 if that should not change without a vote.