ASA Parameters Conventions, Digital Media | Algorand Developer Portal

ASA Parameters Conventions, Digital Media

We introduce community conventions for the parameters of Algorand Standard Assets (ASAs) containing digital media.

Abstract

The goal of these conventions is to make it simpler to display the properties of a given ASA. This ARC differs from ARC-3 by focusing on optimization for fetching of digital media, as well as the use of onchain metadata. Furthermore, since asset configuration transactions are used to store the metadata, this ARC can be applied to existing ASAs.

While mutability helps with backwards compatibility and other use cases, like leveling up an RPG character, some use cases call for immutability. In these cases, the ASA manager MAY remove the manager address, after which point the Algorand network won’t allow anyone to send asset configuration transactions for the ASA. This effectively makes the latest valid ARC-69 metadata immutable.

Specification

The key words “ MUST”, “ MUST NOT”, “ REQUIRED”, “ SHALL”, “ SHALL NOT”, “ SHOULD”, “ SHOULD NOT”, “ RECOMMENDED”, “ MAY”, and “ OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.

An ARC-69 ASA has an associated JSON Metadata file, formatted as specified below, that is stored on-chain in the note field of the most recent asset configuration transaction (that contains a note field with a valid ARC-69 JSON metadata).

ASA Parameters Conventions

The ASA parameters should follow the following conventions:

There are no requirements regarding the manager account of the ASA, or the reserve account. However, if immutability is required the manager address MUST be removed.

Furthermore, the manager address, if present, SHOULD be under the control of the ASA creator, as the manager address can unilaterally change the metadata. Some advanced use cases MAY use a logicsig as ASA manager, if the logicsig only allows to set the note fields by the ASA creator.

JSON Metadata File Schema

{

"title": "Token Metadata",

"type": "object",

"properties": {

"standard": {

"type": "string",

"value": "arc69",

"description": "(Required) Describes the standard used."

},

"description": {

"type": "string",

"description": "Describes the asset to which this token represents."

},

"external_url": {

"type": "string",

"description": "A URI pointing to an external website. Borrowed from Open Sea's metadata format (https://docs.opensea.io/docs/metadata-standards)."

},

"media_url": {

"type": "string",

"description": "A URI pointing to a high resolution version of the asset's media."

},

"properties": {

"type": "object",

"description": "Properties following the EIP-1155 'simple properties' format. (https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1155.md#erc-1155-metadata-uri-json-schema)"

},

"mime_type": {

"type": "string",

"description": "Describes the MIME type of the ASA's URL (`au` field)."

},

"attributes": {

"type": "array",

"description": "(Deprecated. New NFTs should define attributes with the simple `properties` object. Marketplaces should support both the `properties` object and the `attributes` array). The `attributes` array follows Open Sea's format: https://docs.opensea.io/docs/metadata-standards#attributes"

}

},

"required":[

"standard"

]

}

The standard field is REQUIRED and MUST equal arc69. All other fields are OPTIONAL. If provided, the other fields MUST match the description in the JSON schema.

The URI field (external_url) is defined similarly to the Asset URL parameter au. However, contrary to the Asset URL, the external_url does not need to link to the digital media file.

MIME Type

In addition to specifying a data type in the ASA’s URL (au field) with a URI fragment (ex: #v for video), the JSON Metadata schema also allows indication of the URL’s MIME type (ex: video/mp4) via the mime_type field.

Examples

Basic Example

An example of an ARC-69 JSON Metadata file for a song follows. The properties array proposes some SUGGESTED formatting for token-specific display properties and metadata.

{

"standard": "arc69",

"description": "arc69 theme song",

"external_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ",

"mime_type": "video/mp4",

"properties": {

"Bass":"Groovy",

"Vibes":"Funky",

"Overall":"Good stuff"

}

}

An example of possible ASA parameters would be:

Mutability

Rendering

Clients SHOULD render an ASA’s latest ARC-69 metadata. Clients MAY render an ASA’s previous ARC-69 metadata for changelogs or other historical features.

Updating ARC-69 metadata

If an ASA has a manager address, then the manager MAY update an ASA’s ARC-69 metadata. To do so, the manager sends a new acfg transaction with the entire metadata represented as JSON in the transaction’s note field.

Making ARC-69 metadata immutable

Managers MAY make an ASA’s ARC-69 immutable. To do so, they MUST remove the ASA’s manager address with an acfg transaction.

ARC-69 attribute deprecation

The initial version of ARC-69 followed the Open Sea attributes format https://docs.opensea.io/docs/metadata-standards#attributes. As illustrated below:

"attributes": {

"type": "array",

"description": "Attributes following Open Sea's attributes format (https://docs.opensea.io/docs/metadata-standards#attributes)."

}

This format is now deprecated. New NFTs SHOULD use the simple properties format, since it significantly reduces the metadata size.

To be fully compliant with the ARC-69 standard, both the properties object and the attributes array SHOULD be supported.

Rationale

These conventions take inspiration from Open Sea’s metadata standards and EIP-1155 to facilitate interoperability.

The main differences are highlighted below:

Security Considerations

None.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CCO.